<img src="https://tags.srv.stackadapt.com/rt?sid=lX5TOPixR5KulOF6nylJTQ" width="1" height="1">
Skip to the main content.
APPLY NOW RENEW
Facebook Instagram Linkedin YouTube
ALPS Blog
Free Law Firm Guides
Assess Your Firm's Risk
ALPS VERA Icon
Free Risk Assessment Use our free Virtual Ethics Risk Assessment (VERA) tool to quickly and effectively understand where your firm falls in terms of risk management.
Insurance Glossary
← Blog Home

2 min read

Why You Should Never Minimize the Significance of Client Driven Indemnity Provisions

Picture of Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager : Updated on April 10, 2025 | Posted on April 2, 2024

Law Practice Management
Why You Should Never Minimize the Significance of Client Driven Indemnity Provisions

I continue to get the occasional call from a lawyer wanting to know my thoughts about a new business opportunity. It’s a call that often starts out with the lawyer sharing that so and so company wants the lawyer to be their exclusive local point person and the lawyer is hoping I’ll give the idea my risk manager’s stamp of approval. After talking through the issues, I always ask the one question most callers rarely seem to think about. Is there an indemnification provision in the contract? I have yet to hear any lawyer tell me no.

Biz-Quiz-600x300
Truth be told, a number of the lawyers who call about various types of contracts they are considering signing seem surprised when I ask about the presence of any indemnification language. Apparently, they just gloss over certain sections of the contract. Trust me, that’s a misstep. Indemnification provisions are not something to be ignored because they raise very real and potentially significant insurance coverage concerns.

Have you ever stopped to consider how a malpractice insurer might view client driven indemnity provisions? The language often used significantly expands what the lawyer may ultimately be liable for. Absent said language, the lawyer would be liable for any attorney negligence. However, depending upon the specific language at issue, by agreeing to an indemnity provision the lawyer can become liable for all kinds of client losses that are not the result of any attorney negligence. 

This is what creates the coverage problem. In short, by voluntarily agreeing to contractually expand your exposure, you can create a coverage gap because your malpractice insurance company isn’t going to be subject to the terms of this agreement. In addition, malpractice polices routinely contain language that will exclude coverage for obligations assumed by contract that go beyond the obligation to provide professional services. Often, however, signing an agreement that contains an indemnity provision does exactly that.

Unfortunately, this concern isn’t limited to contracts a lawyer is thinking about entering into. Suppose a client inserts an indemnification clause into the boiler plate language of their guidelines and sends that to you. Might your continued representation after receiving the guidelines constitute an acceptance of that clause? I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one who ends up having to find out the hard way.

Today, when more and more lawyers are being treated like general service providers as opposed to trusted advisors, what can you do to avoid this problem? At the outset, read client guidelines and contract proposals front to back. Don’t continue with the representation or sign anything without understanding what your true exposure will be. If you are not comfortable with that exposure, see if the client will remove the problematic language. In the alternative, you could see if inserting language along the lines of “but only to the extent covered by my malpractice insurance policy” at the end of any indemnity clause would be acceptable. Hopefully some clients (your good clients) will understand that the risk they are asking you to take is unfair and they will work to make the agreement acceptable. On the other hand, if any client responds by telling you everyone else signs this so if you want the work, you will too, then I guess you have a decision to make. At least now you know it’s going to boil down to how comfortable you are in self-insuring that risk.
A Risk Management Checklist for Lawyers Who Wish to Share Office Space

A Risk Management Checklist for Lawyers Who Wish to Share Office Space

Picture of Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager : Dec 24, 2025

Office sharing can be beneficial, particularly if the ethical, malpractice, and insurance coverage concerns are addressed up front. This checklist...

Solo and Small Firm Resources Law Practice Management
Read More
The Risks That Come with Serving on a Corporate Board

The Risks That Come with Serving on a Corporate Board

Picture of Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager : Oct 6, 2021

Participation on a corporate board can be a meaningful and fulfilling experience. Just remember that underwriters focus on the ramifications of board...

Solo and Small Firm Resources Law Practice Management
Read More
What Lawyers Should Be Thinking About Before Entering into an Of Counsel Relationship

What Lawyers Should Be Thinking About Before Entering into an Of Counsel Relationship

Picture of Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager : Jul 21, 2021

Here are some examples of what lawyers should consider before entering into an out-of-council relationship.

Law Practice Management
Read More