<img src="https://tags.srv.stackadapt.com/rt?sid=lX5TOPixR5KulOF6nylJTQ" width="1" height="1">
Skip to the main content.
← Blog Home

4 min read

A Decision to Hire a Contract Attorney Should Never Be Just About the Money

A Decision to Hire a Contract Attorney Should Never Be Just About the Money

Solo and small firm lawyers hire contract attorneys for all kinds of reasons: smoothing out workflow spikes, adding subject matter expertise, covering hearings, or simply trying to control overhead. There’s nothing wrong with any of that. In fact, when done thoughtfully, contract attorney relationships can be a smart, client centered way to deliver excellent legal services without overextending your firm.

But here’s the trap: when the decision is driven only by cost savings, it’s too easy to overlook the risk management implications that come along for the ride. And those implications can be significant. Conflicts of interest, accountability for work product, client disclosure, confidentiality, and malpractice insurance coverage all deserve deliberate attention before you bring anyone on board.

This isn’t about discouraging the use of contract attorneys. It’s about helping you use them safely, ethically, and in a way that strengthens, rather than jeopardizes, your practice.

Insurance Coverage: Don’t Assume They’re Covered

One common misconception is the belief that contract attorneys are automatically covered under the firm’s malpractice policy. Sometimes they are. Sometimes they aren’t. And the difference matters. 

Carriers vary widely in how they treat contract attorneys:

  • Some treat them the same as employed attorneys once you notify the carrier and pay any additional premium.

  • Others draw a hard line and will not extend coverage at all.

  • Still others will cover them only if they meet specific criteria (exclusive relationship, no outside clients, long term engagement, etc.).

From the carrier’s perspective, contract attorneys often represent an unknown risk:

  • They may work for multiple firms.

  • They may have their own clients.

  • They may come and go frequently.

  • Their training, supervision, and work habits may be inconsistent.

If your carrier won’t extend coverage, the contract attorney may need their own policy. Just be aware that if they’ll be appearing in court, taking depositions, or having direct client contact, that policy may not provide any coverage for the work they do on behalf of clients of your firm. Of course, having them purchase their own policy may not be necessary if there will never be any client contact and your firm will be reviewing and accepting accountability for the contract attorney’s entire work product.

Here’s the bottom line. Before you hire anyone, call your carrier. Explain the relationship, the scope of work, and the level of access the attorney will have so that the situation can be fully understood, documented, and appropriately underwritten by the carrier if they are willing.

Client Disclosure: It’s Their Matter, Not Yours

Ethically, you must disclose the involvement of contract attorneys in most circumstances. But even beyond the rules, there’s a deeper principle at play: respect for the attorney client relationship.

Clients deserve to know:

  • Who is working on their matter,

  • Why this person is involved,

  • What skills they bring,

  • How confidentiality will be protected, and

  • Whether the arrangement affects cost.

Most clients are perfectly comfortable with contract attorney involvement once they understand the “why” and the “how.” What they don’t appreciate is surprise. A simple, transparent conversation up front builds trust and avoids awkwardness later.

Sample Engagement Letter Disclosure Paragraph

Here’s a client friendly sample paragraph that might prove useful.

Use of Contract Attorneys:

To ensure that your matter receives the appropriate level of attention and expertise, our firm may engage the services of outside contract attorneys for specific tasks such as research, drafting, or court appearances. These attorneys work under our supervision and are bound by the same duties of confidentiality and professional responsibility that apply to all members of the firm. We will review all work performed by contract attorneys, and you will not be billed for their services at a higher rate than you would be billed for comparable work performed within the firm.

Accountability and Supervision: You Own the Work Product

Under agency principles, your firm is responsible for the work performed by contract attorneys acting within the scope of their engagement. Even if you classify them as independent contractors and the contract attorney carries their own malpractice coverage, you may still face:

  • A negligent supervision claim,

  • A negligent hiring claim, or

  • A vicarious liability claim.

Given this, appropriate risk management practices require that you:

  • Establish clear expectations about scope and deadlines,

  • Conduct regular check-ins,

  • Thoroughly review their work product,

  • Obtain a signed confidentiality agreement

  • Train staff not to discuss unrelated matters in front of contract attorneys, and

  • That you ask about prior claims, disciplinary history, and relevant experience.

Stated another way, if you wouldn’t hire them as an associate, don’t hire them as a contract attorney.

The Imputed Conflicts Problem

Conflicts analysis can become significantly more complicated when contract attorneys work with multiple firms or have access to multiple client files, which means the degree of integration matters enormously.

Lower-Risk Scenario

Conflicts are less likely to be imputed to your firm in situations where the contract attorney:

  • Works remotely,

  • Has no access to your firm’s files and systems, and

  • Handles a single, isolated project

Higher-Risk Scenario

Conflicts are far more likely to be imputed to your firm when the contract attorney:

  • Works inside your office,

  • Has broad access to your files or systems,

  • Works on multiple matters,

  • Has direct client contact, and

  • Works simultaneously for other firms

Practical steps to reduce conflict risk:

  • Limit access to only the files necessary for the assignment

  •  

    Use isolated workspaces or a remote only arrangement

  •  

    Restrict access to your case management system

  •  

    Document the scope of the relationship

  •  

    Ask about the attorney’s other clients and engagements

  •  

    Re-run conflicts checks if the relationship expands

Confidentiality and Data Security: Don’t Forget the Digital Side

Even if the contract attorney never sets foot in your office, they may still have access to:

  • Cloud-based files

  • Email threads

  • Client documents

  • Drafts and internal notes

Make sure you address:

  • Secure file-sharing methods

  • Prohibitions on using personal devices without safeguards

  • Password and multifactor authentication requirements

  • Data retention and deletion expectations

  • Confidentiality obligations that survive the engagement

  • Understand that a breach caused by a contract attorney is still a breach of your network.

In Conclusion:  

The decision to use contract attorneys can be an appropriate decision that brings real value to your firm and the clients you serve. Just don’t rush into this for the expense savings alone because there can be unintended consequences that in the end could prove costlier than if you had never hired the contract attorneys in the first place.

ALPS In Brief – Episode 35: How to Assess Risk to Your Firm? Assess yourself!

12 min read

ALPS In Brief – Episode 35: How to Assess Risk to Your Firm? Assess yourself!

ALPS Risk Manager Mark Bassingthwaighte sits down with Matt Sims, co-founder of Standpoint Decision Support Inc. to discuss risk assessment and...

Read More
How to Responsibly Embrace Any and All Digital Tech in the Practice of Law

2 min read

How to Responsibly Embrace Any and All Digital Tech in the Practice of Law

In many jurisdictions, commentary to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 Competency states that lawyers are to keep abreast of the benefits and risks...

Read More
Why Declinations Really Do Need to Be Tracked

4 min read

Why Declinations Really Do Need to Be Tracked

I’ve always been curious about why some attorneys never take the time to make sure that at least the name of every declined prospective client makes...

Read More