4 min read
Are You Giving Your Clients Non-Verbal Cues About Your Competency as a Lawyer?
The number of times I’ve observed or heard about a problematic nonverbal interaction with a client (to which the involved lawyer or staff member was...
3 min read
Mark Bassingthwaighte, Risk Manager
:
Posted on June 28, 2023
I continue to be surprised at the number of times I learn that a law firm turned over complete oversight of client property to a non-attorney member of the firm’s staff. More often than not, the reason for doing so seemed to be that this individual had been employed at the firm for years and viewed as someone worthy of a high level of trust. And while I do believe the development of trusting work relationships is a good thing, unfortunately there can be a downside. My biggest concern is unfettered trust can easily lead to the deterioration, if not the complete abandonment of accountability mechanisms. Sometimes trouble follows.
One story that has stayed with me for years involved a trusted firm administrator who eventually came to be treated by her boss, a solo attorney, as a member of his family. This individual even played a role in helping to raise the attorney’s children. Everything came crashing down when the attorney eventually discovered this trusted employee had been embezzling him for years managing to take well in excess of $100,000. Suffice it to say the attorney never saw it coming. He was crushed by this individual’s deceit.
Before going any further, allow me to say that I do value the professional and personal relationships that can and do arise in a work setting. I believe that placing trust in employees is an appropriate and necessary practice. My purpose here is not to advocate a modicum of distrust. Rather, it is to encourage and underscore the importance of creating and maintaining appropriate mechanisms of accountability for client property. Why? Because, unfortunately, even long-term trusted employees sometimes make really bad decisions. To add insult to injury, should such an unfortunate event ever occur in your firm and adequate safeguards were not in place, you might end up on the wrong side of a disciplinary action. You cannot and should not delegate total and complete responsibility for all accounting functions to non-lawyer staff. Simply put, as an attorney you have an ethical duty to oversee the safekeeping of client property.
With all this in mind, here are a few ideas to help you avoid problems and, if followed, can help demonstrate that an appropriate level of attorney oversight of client property was in place should a theft ever occur.
4 min read
The number of times I’ve observed or heard about a problematic nonverbal interaction with a client (to which the involved lawyer or staff member was...
6 min read
Trust, which is built upon a lawyer’s ethical duty to keep all information relating to the representation of a client confidential, is the hallmark...
3 min read
Occasionally a lawyer will reach out to me wanting clarification on what should be covered in a letter notifying active clients, whose matters the...